GRC & Compliance

Drata

Continuous trust, compliance, and GRC platform for automating compliance operations and scaling risk and assurance programs.

Quick decision

Best for
Organizations starting with a framework and planning to mature into broader GRC
Price
Pricing is personalized.
Main trade-off
Ownership cost depends on organization and program scope
Company:
Drata
Category:
GRC & Compliance

Key signals

Pricing model
Custom
Free plan
No free plan listed
Business sizes
Small Business, Mid Market, Enterprise
  • Compliance automation
  • Continuous controls
  • Risk management
  • Third-party risk

Why choose it / Think twice if

Why choose it

  • Strong continuous-compliance model
  • Scalable GRC path
  • Risk and vendor-risk capabilities

Think twice if

  • Personalized pricing limits instant comparison
  • Broader implementation requires process maturity
  • More complex than basic compliance checklists

Use cases and fit

Primary use cases

  • Continuous compliance monitoring
  • Framework implementation
  • Risk management
  • Third-party risk
  • Trust Center management
  • Audit and assurance workflows

Ideal for

  • Organizations starting with a framework and planning to mature into broader GRC
  • Teams wanting continuous compliance operations
  • Businesses needing risk, vendor-risk, and assurance workflows

May not suit

  • Buyers wanting a simple checklist without ongoing control ownership
  • Teams unable to support a broader compliance process
  • Organizations requiring instant self-serve pricing

Pricing snapshot

Pricing is personalized.

  • The Foundation entry tier is described for up to 50 FTEs and one pre-mapped framework from eligible options; higher GRC plans expand framework and customization scope.
  • No fixed price or free trial is represented here.

Security and privacy

Security information

Assess control ownership, evidence access, risk workflows, and assurance requirements before rollout.

Data privacy information

Review evidence sources, vendor data, subprocessors, retention, and regional handling requirements.

Decision summary

Is this the right fit?

Strong fit ifstrong continuous-compliance model

Main trade-offMore complex than basic compliance checklists

Verify before choosingValidate Foundation limits, framework mapping, integrations, and higher-plan requirements against the intended program.

Consider Vanta instead ifcompliance monitoring is part of a broader trust-management program spanning risk, customer trust and security-review workflows, reporting, and ongoing GRC operations rather than a control-testing, framework-readiness, and test or control-level remediation loop.

Continue with DrataView Vanta

Other alternatives

Thoropass

Consider Thoropass instead if guided compliance and audit-oriented support matter more than software-led operations alone.

View Thoropass

Continue when you are ready

Review the provider's current offer when you are ready to act. Verify time-sensitive pricing and terms before purchase.

Visit Drata's official website

Editorial trust

Last verified: Aug 18, 2026Pricing and features can change. Verify current details on the official site.How SaaSvan evaluates software